Disco DeDisco f9cd08a510 CI: FT stages run in parallel, --parallel dropped intra-stage — bud-btn click sites bypass scroll-into-view ; .woodpecker/main.yaml restructures the FT split — test-FTs-non-room + test-FTs-room now both depends_on: test-two-browser-FTs (instead of room serially depending on non-room) so they fan out + run concurrently, each w. its own DATABASE_URL: sqlite:////tmp/test_db_{non_room,room}.sqlite3 outside the shared workspace mount so the two stages can't see each other's SQLite file + the #296 EOFError-on-half-created-test-db blocker is gone; --parallel flag dropped from both manage.py test invocations because the empirical wall-clock from #302-304 (151 tests in ~42 min, 83 tests in ~16 min — ~16-17s/test avg either way) shows ~1-1.5x speedup at best — Firefox spawn cost (~3-5s cold-start × 38 tests/worker) + RAM pressure (4 headless Firefoxes ≈ 1.5-2GB working set on a quadcore DO droplet) + SQLite file-lock contention eat most of the gain the cores would otherwise give, while the contention amplifies every transient-DOM flake we've spent the last 2 days chasing (login-race in #300/303 → 054b0aa + ad0041d, gecko-perms in #302/303 → ad0041d, ElementNotInteractable in #304 → this commit, Jasmine-timeout in #303 → ad0041d); stage-level parallelism gets back the wall-clock reduction (~16min savings vs serial stages) w.o. amplifying within-stage contention — net wall clock should be ~60-65min for both FT stages running concurrently vs ~58min today, but flake exposure drops dramatically; downstream screendumps + build-and-push already list both FT steps in their depends_on so they naturally gate on the slower of the two ; test_core_bud_btn.py wraps 4 unwrapped find_element(...).click() sites in wait_for(execute_script("arguments[0].click()", btn)) — the _open_panel_and_invite helper feeding 6 GatekeeperBudBtnAsyncInviteTest tests + the standalone GatekeeperBudBtnDuplicateInviteErrorTest test_duplicate_invite_shows_error_brief_and_fyi_flashes_slot click + both .note-banner--duplicate .note-banner__fyi clicks (one on the share-flow at line 433, one on the gatekeeper-invite-flow at line 622) — pipeline #304 errored on the OK button click w. ElementNotInteractableException: Element <button id="id_bud_ok"> could not be scrolled into view because the post-send_keys autocomplete dropdown on _bud_invite_panel.html briefly overlapped the OK button under CI contention so Firefox refused the scroll-into-view; same pattern + same fix shape as confirm_guard in base.py — execute_script bypasses Selenium's scroll-into-view gate entirely + wait_for absorbs any leftover transient state via WebDriverException retry ; commit only ships the test-side fix + CI restructure; if the CI changes work as intended (green pipeline #305) the docker-rebuild option for python-tdd-ci:latest still stands as the next ~5min/pipeline win, separately filed in project_ci_remove_pip_install_deferred.md — TDD ...

Code architected by Disco DeDisco <discodedisco@outlook.com>
Git commit message Co-Authored-By:
Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-05-13 14:12:38 -04:00

.woodpecker

CI: FT stages run in parallel, --parallel dropped intra-stage — bud-btn click sites bypass scroll-into-view ; .woodpecker/main.yaml restructures the FT split — test-FTs-non-room + test-FTs-room now both depends_on: test-two-browser-FTs (instead of room serially depending on non-room) so they fan out + run concurrently, each w. its own DATABASE_URL: sqlite:////tmp/test_db_{non_room,room}.sqlite3 outside the shared workspace mount so the two stages can't see each other's SQLite file + the #296 EOFError-on-half-created-test-db blocker is gone; --parallel flag dropped from both manage.py test invocations because the empirical wall-clock from #302-304 (151 tests in ~42 min, 83 tests in ~16 min — ~16-17s/test avg either way) shows ~1-1.5x speedup at best — Firefox spawn cost (~3-5s cold-start × 38 tests/worker) + RAM pressure (4 headless Firefoxes ≈ 1.5-2GB working set on a quadcore DO droplet) + SQLite file-lock contention eat most of the gain the cores would otherwise give, while the contention amplifies every transient-DOM flake we've spent the last 2 days chasing (login-race in #300/303 → 054b0aa + ad0041d, gecko-perms in #302/303 → ad0041d, ElementNotInteractable in #304 → this commit, Jasmine-timeout in #303 → ad0041d); stage-level parallelism gets back the wall-clock reduction (~16min savings vs serial stages) w.o. amplifying within-stage contention — net wall clock should be ~60-65min for both FT stages running concurrently vs ~58min today, but flake exposure drops dramatically; downstream screendumps + build-and-push already list both FT steps in their depends_on so they naturally gate on the slower of the two ; test_core_bud_btn.py wraps 4 unwrapped find_element(...).click() sites in wait_for(execute_script("arguments[0].click()", btn)) — the _open_panel_and_invite helper feeding 6 GatekeeperBudBtnAsyncInviteTest tests + the standalone GatekeeperBudBtnDuplicateInviteErrorTest test_duplicate_invite_shows_error_brief_and_fyi_flashes_slot click + both .note-banner--duplicate .note-banner__fyi clicks (one on the share-flow at line 433, one on the gatekeeper-invite-flow at line 622) — pipeline #304 errored on the OK button click w. ElementNotInteractableException: Element <button id="id_bud_ok"> could not be scrolled into view because the post-send_keys autocomplete dropdown on _bud_invite_panel.html briefly overlapped the OK button under CI contention so Firefox refused the scroll-into-view; same pattern + same fix shape as confirm_guard in base.py — execute_script bypasses Selenium's scroll-into-view gate entirely + wait_for absorbs any leftover transient state via WebDriverException retry ; commit only ships the test-side fix + CI restructure; if the CI changes work as intended (green pipeline #305) the docker-rebuild option for python-tdd-ci:latest still stands as the next ~5min/pipeline win, separately filed in project_ci_remove_pip_install_deferred.md — TDD

2026-05-13 14:12:38 -04:00

infra

pyswiss_url env var added to more places throughout ansible vault architecture; staging now has working astro wheel

2026-04-16 12:04:46 -04:00

pyswiss

natus wheel: Semisquare & Sesquiquadrate; Ott orb pair detection; intensity sort

2026-04-27 20:16:47 -04:00

src

CI: FT stages run in parallel, --parallel dropped intra-stage — bud-btn click sites bypass scroll-into-view ; .woodpecker/main.yaml restructures the FT split — test-FTs-non-room + test-FTs-room now both depends_on: test-two-browser-FTs (instead of room serially depending on non-room) so they fan out + run concurrently, each w. its own DATABASE_URL: sqlite:////tmp/test_db_{non_room,room}.sqlite3 outside the shared workspace mount so the two stages can't see each other's SQLite file + the #296 EOFError-on-half-created-test-db blocker is gone; --parallel flag dropped from both manage.py test invocations because the empirical wall-clock from #302-304 (151 tests in ~42 min, 83 tests in ~16 min — ~16-17s/test avg either way) shows ~1-1.5x speedup at best — Firefox spawn cost (~3-5s cold-start × 38 tests/worker) + RAM pressure (4 headless Firefoxes ≈ 1.5-2GB working set on a quadcore DO droplet) + SQLite file-lock contention eat most of the gain the cores would otherwise give, while the contention amplifies every transient-DOM flake we've spent the last 2 days chasing (login-race in #300/303 → 054b0aa + ad0041d, gecko-perms in #302/303 → ad0041d, ElementNotInteractable in #304 → this commit, Jasmine-timeout in #303 → ad0041d); stage-level parallelism gets back the wall-clock reduction (~16min savings vs serial stages) w.o. amplifying within-stage contention — net wall clock should be ~60-65min for both FT stages running concurrently vs ~58min today, but flake exposure drops dramatically; downstream screendumps + build-and-push already list both FT steps in their depends_on so they naturally gate on the slower of the two ; test_core_bud_btn.py wraps 4 unwrapped find_element(...).click() sites in wait_for(execute_script("arguments[0].click()", btn)) — the _open_panel_and_invite helper feeding 6 GatekeeperBudBtnAsyncInviteTest tests + the standalone GatekeeperBudBtnDuplicateInviteErrorTest test_duplicate_invite_shows_error_brief_and_fyi_flashes_slot click + both .note-banner--duplicate .note-banner__fyi clicks (one on the share-flow at line 433, one on the gatekeeper-invite-flow at line 622) — pipeline #304 errored on the OK button click w. ElementNotInteractableException: Element <button id="id_bud_ok"> could not be scrolled into view because the post-send_keys autocomplete dropdown on _bud_invite_panel.html briefly overlapped the OK button under CI contention so Firefox refused the scroll-into-view; same pattern + same fix shape as confirm_guard in base.py — execute_script bypasses Selenium's scroll-into-view gate entirely + wait_for absorbs any leftover transient state via WebDriverException retry ; commit only ships the test-side fix + CI restructure; if the CI changes work as intended (green pipeline #305) the docker-rebuild option for python-tdd-ci:latest still stands as the next ~5min/pipeline win, separately filed in project_ci_remove_pip_install_deferred.md — TDD

2026-05-13 14:12:38 -04:00

.dockerignore

ignore .vscode/ in git & docker contexts; workspace tasks/settings are local-only (Windows paths + per-machine venv layout)

2026-05-04 18:17:54 -04:00

.gitattributes

added .gitattributes for real this time

2026-02-17 17:57:20 -05:00

.gitignore

ignore .vscode/ in git & docker contexts; workspace tasks/settings are local-only (Windows paths + per-machine venv layout)

2026-05-04 18:17:54 -04:00

ansible.cfg

Gitea repo init; Woodpecker pipeline init; much CI/CD structure outlined in ./infra, incl. docker-compose.yaml, cicd-playbook.yaml, new cicd vault, & config files for gitea, woodpecker & ansible

2026-02-10 21:16:00 -05:00

CLAUDE.md

rename natus → sky across the codebase — natal chart abstraction is now sky throughout, since chart inputs aren't birthday-gated

2026-05-04 20:36:15 -04:00

Dockerfile

Dockerfile updated to run uvicorn worker class to support asgi (was still gunicorn & wsgi)

2026-03-18 22:03:10 -04:00

Dockerfile.ci

Dockerfile.ci & debug-ci now build working container for CI test image

2026-02-10 22:42:45 -05:00

requirements.dev.txt

requirements: align dev w. prod — add celery, psycopg2-binary, redis to requirements.dev.txt (missing from the CI dev image's pre-installed set, which means the CI fallback pip install -r requirements.dev.txt step would not satisfy these prod runtime deps if the image lagged); bump requests 2.31.0 → 2.32.5 in requirements.txt to align w. the dev pin (eliminates the version-drift wedge where CI's dev-only install would silently downgrade-or-upgrade vs prod's pin)

2026-05-12 20:10:22 -04:00

requirements.txt

requirements: align dev w. prod — add celery, psycopg2-binary, redis to requirements.dev.txt (missing from the CI dev image's pre-installed set, which means the CI fallback pip install -r requirements.dev.txt step would not satisfy these prod runtime deps if the image lagged); bump requests 2.31.0 → 2.32.5 in requirements.txt to align w. the dev pin (eliminates the version-drift wedge where CI's dev-only install would silently downgrade-or-upgrade vs prod's pin)

2026-05-12 20:10:22 -04:00

requirements.wsl.txt

added wsl reqs

2026-01-13 20:58:25 -05:00

Description

No description provided

155 MiB

Languages

Python 45%

JavaScript 37.6%

HTML 9%

SCSS 8.2%

Jinja 0.1%